PL EN
Olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents – mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy.
 
More details
Hide details
1
Student Scientific Club, Department of Medical Diagnostics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College
 
2
Department of Medical Diagnostics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College
 
 
Submission date: 2025-05-26
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-09-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-20
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-12-31
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Anna Lizoń   

Uniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium Medicum, Wydział Farmaceutyczny, Zakład Diagnostyki Medycznej, ul. Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków
 
 
Psychiatr Pol 2025;59(6):1003-1015
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background: Olanzapine is widely used for schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, yet its role in adolescents remains debated due to metabolic risks. Objective: To review mechanisms, efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and guideline positions of olanzapine in youth, with comparison to adults. Methods: Narrative synthesis of randomized trials, open-label studies, meta-analyses, and major guidelines (APA, NICE, Canadian), with focused appraisal of pediatric data. Results: Olanzapine’s multi-receptor antagonism (D₂, 5-HT₂A/2C, H₁, muscarinic, α₁) underpins robust antipsychotic effects. In adolescents, short-term RCTs show significant improvement in PANSS/BPRS-C and YMRS versus placebo; efficacy is broadly comparable to risperidone and aripiprazole. Pharmacokinetics are similar to adults, though exposure is ~27–34% higher in youth. Adverse effects—especially weight gain, dyslipidemia, hyperprolactinemia, and glycemic abnormalities—are more pronounced in adolescents. Guidelines endorse olanzapine as an option for schizophrenia and as first-line for acute mania; OFC is recommended for bipolar depression by most but not NICE. LAI olanzapine is not approved <18 years. Conclusions: Olanzapine is effective in adolescent psychosis and mania but carries substantial metabolic liability. Given no clear efficacy advantage over other SGAs, it is best positioned as a second-line agent in youth, with preference for monotherapy, cautious dosing, and stringent metabolic monitoring. Evidence for benefits on negative and cognitive symptoms in adolescents remains limited.
eISSN:2391-5854
ISSN:0033-2674
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top